My days are full of things

It has been a busy few weeks, mostly filled with my day job, which has been stretching into my weekends.  This past weekend was the first weekend that I’ve had all month that I have been been doing something for work or preparing to do something for work, and I have been passing it slowly, in the laziest way I know how.

This is to say that I have been writing, or at least, editing writing that I’ve done previously.  I have a project in the works that has forced me to confront my portfolio of short stories.  I have found them pretty lacking, even the stories that won me a reasonable acclaim and some actual money in college, so I’ve been rewriting large swathes of them.  I can see mistakes that were made, places where I cringe at the crudeness of the writing.  And so, rather than work on something new, I find myself reworking stories that have already been reviewed and edited to death.  And yet, coming up with something different, something that is, I hope, better.

It does beggar an obvious question.  When is good good enough?  How do you know when your work is good enough to share with the world?

I read a blog post this weekend that has filled me with some new inspiration.  I wish I hadn’t lost the link.  It was written by a woman who has written a few novels and has absolutely no intention of quitting her day job.  I’ve often felt a certain inability to move forward with my writing because I fear the effect it will have on my career, which is important to me, even for non-financial reasons.  Any success with my writing seems like something that could only interfere, because my day job is competitive and unrelated.  I’m already one of the only women I know in my field, so I think that I sometimes get hypersensitive to doing things that make me stand out in a bad way or suggest that my whole life is not focused on pursuing technology.  But as I read this blog post, I realized that maybe it’s not such a disadvantage that I have both sides to me, that perhaps this could even be a benefit.  I have often felt the two sides of me were at odds, with my writing credentials undercutting my tech credentials and vice versa (weirdly, my CCNP did not impress NYU’s English department), but maybe there’s more benefit there than I ever realized.

All things to think more about, while I keep writing.

Movie Review: Les Miserables

    I have been fighting off a pretty intense allergy attack this week that had me home sick from work on Wednesday and working from home on Thursday.  I was so sick, in fact, that I watched a movie without anything in my hands, which is an event that should be marked on the calendar for its rarity.  I had heard good things about the latest rendition of Les Miserables and I really like a lot of the stars, so I rented it, even though I have a love-hate affair with the musical.  The characterization drives me absolutely nuts, because it is so shallow.  Sure, but it’s a musical, you say.

Watch Camelot, I say, to see how it can be done.

Let’s start with Marius.  I think we are supposed to like him, but he bothers me.  Aside from hiding his rich family order to better fit in with les pauvres, his treatment of Eponine is so blind as to be offensive.  He’s so unaware of her feelings as to be cruel, asking her to further his liaison with Cosette, who he falls in love with after just one glance.  And Cosette, of course, because cooincidences rule the day (apparently there about five people in all of Victor Hugo’s France), happens to be the young girl that Eponine’s parents abused all of those years; our darling bland Cosette.  Marius is even worse in the novel.

And poor Cosette.  We’re supposed to pity her because her foster family made her go out in the dark and get water from a well.  In the book there’s a great deal more, but in the musical, she sings a sad song about a castle on a cloud (uhm, yeah), has to get a pail of water in the dark forest, is saved by our hero Jean Valjean, then lives a nice life with her new rich Papa, while Eponine continues to be cursed by her godawful parents.  Beyond that, Cosette is always an angelic blonde.  That is the end of her characterization. I have a hard time understanding why she’s important at all, because she’s one of the most boring characters to have hit the stage in a really long time.  Yet much of the plot revolves around her happiness, which I don’t care at all about.  She won when Jean Valjean showed up in her life.

Eponine I care about.  Eponine I want to grab by the shoulders and say, “Girlfriend, grow a spine and tell him.  If he says no, he didn’t deserve you.”

It goes on from there.  Potentially Jean Valjean could be really interesting.  He’s our good guy archetype – the giant man with extraordinary strength and a convict past.  But he’s such a good guy that we find out that he only stole out of desperation to save the life of a child.  That’s what he does. He saves the lives of children.  Even when his inaction and distraction leads to Fantine turning to prostitution and dying of consumption and exposure, we sympathize with him because he regrets it and goes off and saves Cosette.

Say what?

The play would be better if we discovered that Jean was a big liar and never had a sister.  Or even if he had a bit on the side.  Something.  Anything!  And then, without any concern at all, he just accepts this stranger that Cosette has fallen in love with and sets her up to marry him, without a single question.  Again…say what?

One of the best characters is Javert, who is supposed to be the bad guy, or at least as much of a bad guy as a French writer can manage. He is a really sympathetic bad guy, clearly blinded by his own fanaticism, blinded so clearly so that you rather pity him.  Javert has blind faith in the law and it is his entire purpose.  There are no shades of grey in Javert’s world until Jean Valjean goes off and does his angelic good guy thing and saves Javert’s life, which forces Javert to recognize that morality can be ambigious.  Javert’s faith fails him and it actually destroys him.  Now that’s a character I can get into, even if the play gives me nothing other than this one fact about him.  Likewise, the other fanatic, Enjolras who is more brave than wise, but dies keeping his beliefs to the end.

Tell me that you don’t want to get up on that bridge with him and talk Javert down and give him a hug?

My problems with the characterization aside, the music is powerful, with a few pearls of lyrics that are well worth sitting through it.  There are a number of songs in the musical where you have opposing characters singing rounds that are pretty amazing.  And this staging of Les Miserables was certainly the best one that I’ve ever seen.  I thought Russell Crowe was a brilliant Javert and from time to time, I even forgot that Hugh Jackman was Australian.  The cast was excellent and the music was well performed, with no weak points at all.  The filming was gorgeous, with an opening scene that I won’t forget for a long time.

Beethoven “Moonlight” Sonata op 27 # 2 Mov 3 Valentina Lisitsa – YouTube

Beethoven “Moonlight” Sonata op 27 # 2 Mov 3 Valentina Lisitsa – YouTube.

Beethoven actually believed that people played his music badly on purpose just to vex him. Is that what genius is?  A total lack of understanding of the limitations of other people?

The world may have their sports athletes that they admire for amazing physical feats; I have pianists.  The way those long-fingered hands dance across that keyboard is a thing of amazing endurance and skill.  I am in awe.

20130505 (95/365)

20130505 (95/365) by searchingbuddha
20130505 (95/365), a photo by searchingbuddha on Flickr.

It’s become that part of spring where it’s impossible to not fall in love all over again with flowers. Daffodils, tulips and crocuses are sprouting up everywhere as the trees burst into bloom. Our cherry blossoms are just blooming now, nearly a month after the trees in D.C. bloomed, so I get to live it all over again.

It’s days like these that I really fall in love with the suburbs, as I watch the trees open up and bloom each spring. Even though my allergies are in full force, it’s absolutely worth it to see the majesty of nature, in microcosm.